20 May 2016

Modi @ 2: A path for steady reforms

Modi @ 2: A path for steady reforms
The overall verdict will depend on a philosophical question: Does one see the glass half full or half empty?
As the Modi administration completes two years, it’s but fair to say that the government while tempering expectations, realizing the challenges on political and economic fronts, is laying a steady and robust foundation for economic reforms. The Economist aptly sums up the Modi government’s achievements by underpinning the fall of “rent-seeking” trends in India’s bureaucracy. Improved rating in the 2015 World Bank report and World Economic Forum’s index on business competitiveness speak for themselves on achievements thus far. With sustained growth momentum, India is in a sweet spot, pulling its weight to positively influence growth trends in the region, given the slowdown in China.
Among crucial achievements, a proactive foreign diplomacy, unprecedented emphasis on attracting FDI (foreign direct investment) and foreign institutional portfolio investors without jeopardizing prospects of a “Make-in-India” pitch, progressive legislation and decisive executive actions stand out. Macroeconomic indicators project a clearer picture on fiscal discipline, with short-to-medium term GDP growth strategy range-bound between 7.5-8%. Structural reforms in the form of subsidy management and distribution, and social security platforms (Jan Dhan Yojana) combined with financial inclusion will certainly yield long-term results. Steady growth in foreign exchange reserves and benign inflationary trends are encouraging, as the government reaffirms its commitment to growth in public spending, particularly on roads, ports, railways and rural electrification.
The government’s diplomacy has led to a rise in the country’s stature; India’s demands for a permanent seat in the UN Security Council and membership of the Nuclear Suppliers Group now appear closer to realization. As the world takes note of India’s economic resilience, a gush of foreign investments has been witnessed over the past 24 months. Latest OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) statistics show FDI in India grew by 31% in 2015, as compared to a decline in major emerging economies including Brazil, Russia, China, South Africa and Indonesia.
Independent surveys suggest an unprecedented climb in foreign inflows which permit tapping potential of key sectors such as insurance, defence, retail trade and pharmaceuticals. In tandem with equity market reforms, the charismatic central bank governor has shown the way for conservative though sensible monetary policy and debt market reforms. The government’s bold initiative for liberal foreign borrowing guidelines has allowed wider access to relatively cheaper sources of debt for infrastructure project development, given restricted ability of Indian financial institutions.
On structural reforms, a host of legislative and policy reforms with stress on innovation in sectors such as railways, roads, coal and energy seem to be the mantra of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s colleagues. Most recently, enactment of a comprehensive insolvency and bankruptcy law underlines credibility of the government’s endeavours to address balance-sheet woes of public sector banks, force delinquent borrowers to rearrange their balance sheets and kick-start stalled projects.
The legislation promises an entrepreneur-friendly legal framework for speedier, transparent and efficient resolution of corporate insolvencies, and will inspire confidence (of investors) in stalled infrastructure projects, innovation-intensive and risky start-up ventures. Amendments to the SARFAESI (Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest) law and debt recovery statute will allow investors time-bound exits, and recalibrate distressed and non-performing investments. Amendments to the Arbitration Act will facilitate speedier resolution of commercial disputes. Enactment of a real estate law is a big leg-up for the industry to establish accountability and protect consumer interest.
New defence procurement procedures and a draft national civil aviation policy are milestone moves in India’s aerospace and defence industries which hold untapped investment potential and consumer interest. An overhauled hydrocarbon exploration and licensing policy regime heralds a change from a profit- to revenue-sharing model and a way to avoid disputes that have historically plagued interests of international investors in this important sector. A regulatory framework for start-ups is expected to lay a strong foundation for a rapidly growing industry which holds potential for growth of entrepreneurship and employment generation.
Tax policy and administrative reforms have been at the forefront with bold budgets and successive administrative announcements. Beginning from the 2015 budget, tax proposals and legislative amendments have been calibrated with a view to providing a predictable and transparent regime, both to domestic and foreign investors with focus on taxpayer service. While the government has been adhering to its promise to refrain from retrospective legislations, its announcements have instilled confidence in tax administration. With G20’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project led by OECD taking centre stage, it is clear that the tax policy stance on General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR), transfer pricing documentation, tax treaty abuse, transparency in information sharing, dealing with tax crimes, etc., will be to align domestic policies with global best practices. Recently introduced equalization levy for e-commerce enterprises, enhanced documentation requirement for transfer pricing, impending GAAR legislation and amendments to the India-Mauritius tax treaty are obvious fallouts of BEPS initiatives.
Though the goods and services tax (GST) legislation continues to hang fire, its passage never seemed as close as it appears now. Both GST and the land bill have been obvious casualties of the government’s lack of legislative majority in the Upper House. However, the record of bills passed in last two Parliament sessions has given a sense of optimism to investors. The success factors for the future lie in keeping up the momentum to increase public expenditure, actualize reforms in public sector banks, implementation of several flagship schemes, and a thrust on infrastructure and social sectors.
The overall verdict will depend on a philosophical question: Does one see the glass half full or half empty? Considering where the economy stood in 2014, I certainly see the glass more than half full as the new government comes close to completing its first innings.

Intellectual Property Rights: New policy may power R&D, national growth

Intellectual Property Rights: New policy may power R&D, national growth
The announcement of the new IPR policy has been a much sought after reform considering the unfavourable regulatory environment prevalent in the country. The new policy is expected to encourage the IPR regime, making it more efficient.
- At last count, a total of 2.37 lakh patent applications and over 5.44 lakh trademark registrations were deemed as pending, some of these hanging fire for years. The main reason for these pendency figures (updated March 10, 2016) has been attributed to the shortage of manpower in the country’s intellectual property offices. The unclogging of the pendency and quality examination are at the heart of improving the robustness of India’s Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) system, something that the government has moved towards by announcing the country’s first IPR policy.
The new National Intellectual Property Rights policy seeks to put in place a legal framework that will encourage the IPR regime and reduce the time taken by the government to approve a trademark to a month by 2017. Currently, the process takes more than 12 months on an average. The policy, approved by the Cabinet last Thursday, nominates the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) as the nodal agency for regulating intellectual property rights in the country.
For those in industry, the government’s move to streamline the IP related laws under a single department is a big positive, considering that this will help in streamlining of the intellectual property framework in the country. As of 2014, India’s spend on research and development (0.8 per cent of GDP) significantly lagged global counterparts such as China (1.9 per cent), Korea (3.8 per cent) and the US (2.7 per cent). In 2015, India ranked a dismal 29th out of 30 countries in the International IP Index released by the Global Intellectual Property Center of the US Chamber of Commerce, a ranking that measures the overall IP environment in a country. China was ranked 19th in the same list.
A major factor behind the lag in India’s country-level performance over global counterparts, according to a January 2016 PwC-Assocham study on ‘Innovation-driven growth in India’, has been the lacklustre performance of its enterprises. For instance, India has just five companies among the leading 500 brands worldwide, while China has 32. In terms of creating global businesses, only three Indian firms were listed on the NYSE International 100 Index as of 2013, as compared to 22 Canadian firms and 16 from the UK. The IP issue is even more compelling in the context of the state of India’s SME (small and medium enterprises) sector, which employ 40 per cent of India’s overall workforce but contribute only 17 per cent to the nation’s GDP. This is mainly due to an unfavourable regulatory environment, marked by the need for multiple procedures and high paid-in capital to start a new business, according to PwC. As a result, a whopping 94 per cent of SMEs are currently unregistered, which leaves them struggling with issues such as shortage of skilled workers, limited market exposure and restricted access to capital. Of the total number of SMEs, only 0.2 per cent are medium-sized firms, employing between 100 and 1,000 people. The lack of access to funds results in limited technology adoption within these firms, leading to system inefficiencies that lower national productivity. On the other hand, the German Mittelstand (GM), comprising SMEs is an example that highlights the potential within this segment to contribute to national growth. GM firms account for almost 60 per cent of the employment within Germany and contribute more than 50 per cent to the national economic output. In India too, there are exceptions. The Indian telecom industry, for example, has leapfrogged to mobile telephony, skipping fixed-line technology and within a space of 20 years (1995-2014), the sector recorded 910 million mobile-phone subscriptions —18 times the number of landline connections in 2006 (50 million), the year when landline subscriptions reached their peak. In India, these innovations, according to the PwC paper, could be categorised into three broad categories: * Technology-driven innovation, which involves the development of new advanced technology systems, such as the Aadhaar platform, Bajaj Auto’s DTS-i technology or Vortex Engineering’s solar powered ATMs. * Market-driven innovation, which includes products that create innovative value propositions for new customer segments. Examples include Tata Ace one-tonne commercial vehicles and GE India’s low-cost ECG machines. * Operations-driven innovation, which includes innovations in processes achieved by adopting cost-efficient practices or by creating new supply and distribution channels, Examples include companies such as the Narayana Health Group and Aravind Eye Hospital that have lowered the cost of heart and eye surgeries through operational efficiencies achieved from volume-driven business models. The objectives of the government’s new IPR policy, officials said, focus on strengthening the legal and legislative framework of IPRs, their commercialisation; and reinforcing the enforcement and adjudicatory mechanisms for IPR infringements. This has been a work in progress. In the run up to the policy, the government has sanctioned 481 additional posts in the office of Controller General of Patents Designs and Trademarks under the Twelfth Plan as part of the Plan Scheme for Modernisation and Strengthening of Intellectual Property Offices. The selection process to fill up 458 vacant posts of Examiners of Patents and Designs has already been completed and the approval of competent authority for appointment to these posts has been accorded, officials said. Besides, as a short-time measure, 263 contractual posts of Examiners of Patents and Designs and 100 contractual posts of Trademarks Examiners have also been created. 
Incidentally, India’s IPR policy comes at a time when developed economies are trying to force it to put in place even stronger IPR frameworks through mega-regional trade agreements, including the WTO’s agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). In April, the US Trade Representative kept India, China and Russia on its “Priority Watch List” for inadequate improvement in IPR protection. According to the government, the new policy will try to safeguard the interests of rights owners keeping in mind the wider public interest while combating infringements of IPRs. Finance minister Arun Jaitley, while announcing the new policy, said that the country would retain the right to issue so-called compulsory licences to its drug firms, under “emergency” conditions, and would not immediately need to change patent laws that were already fully WTO-compliant. “Compulsory licences are already provided in our patent law. That existing provision will continue,” Jaitley said. Compulsory licences enable a domestic drug manufacturer to produce patented drugs that are not available to the public at a reasonable price. -

19 May 2016

India needs to spend 3.77% of GDP to tackle poverty

India needs to spend 3.77% of GDP to tackle poverty
MGNREGS must be beefed up to provide jobs for rural poor, says the International Labour Organization
India needs to spend $61.11 billion a year, or 3.77% of its gross domestic product, to tackle the alarming levels of extreme poverty and rural distress and, simultaneously, beef up the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) to provide guaranteed jobs for the rural poor, International Labour Organization (ILO) director-general Guy Ryder said on Wednesday.
Over 230 million people live below what is called the extreme poverty level, with a daily income of less than $1.90, while 680 million survive below the moderate poverty level of $3.10 a day, in terms of purchasing power parity.
To push people in extreme poverty to moderate levels, India will have to scale up its expenditure on various job generation programmes to the tune of $61.11 billion a year.
“The MGNREGS has had an emblematic value in addressing extreme poverty and needs to be strengthened by the government,” Ryder said. Clearly, the current government needs to continue with the scheme to make a dent in extreme poverty, the ILO director-general said.
MGNREGS was introduced by the previous United Progressive Alliance government in 2005.
At the release of the ILO’s flagship report ‘World Employment and Social Outlook (WESO) 2016—Transforming Jobs to End Poverty’, Ryder reminded the Narendra Modi government that sustained income transfers coupled with social protections schemes, including formalizing “informal labour”, are the pre-requisites for coming to grips with worsening extreme and even moderate poverty.
The ILO’s report estimates that over 36% of the developing world lives in poverty—on a daily income of less than $3.10 in purchasing power parity terms. The report calls on all nations to spend some $600 billion a year—or nearly $10 trillion over 15 years—for eradicating extreme and moderate poverty.
India ranks high among countries with extreme poverty and has to raise, by over 200%, its current levels of spending for people to cross into moderate poverty.
ILO says vulnerable employment in developing countries, where people have jobs but remain unpaid because of lack of social protection, is raising new social tensions, including extremism. Further, the high levels of poverty coupled with income inequality reduce the impact of economic growth on poverty reduction. Several studies have recently debunked the theory that high economic growth eventually contributes to reducing poverty.
At a time when India remains drowned in rural distress and growing extreme poverty due to lack of jobs, the government must devise policies geared towards social protection on a war footing. The “virtues of MGNREGS are many”, said an ILO official.
The scheme has, by assuring a minimum wage, raised the overall income floor in rural areas. The current rural distress, according to the official, is largely due to the substantial reduction of expenditure on MGNREGS which, in turn, reduced the levels of employment. “The situation in India is quite distressful and the government must invest in rural infrastructure,” the official said.
Further, the focus on urban development and urban amenities have worsened living conditions in rural India, the official maintained.
“These are worrying situations and they have to be properly addressed through policies for employment generation in the rural sector,” the official added. The Narendra Modi government must also focus on formalizing employment for the 90% engaged in the informal sector by simplifying procedures, enhancing credit, and other schemes. “...crowding people into the formal economy is a very complex process but it can be done,” Ryder said.

18 May 2016

IAS-2015 PRE SOLUTION BY UPSC

UPSC/IAS -2015 CUTOFF:SAMVEG IAS

IAS-2015 TOPPERS MARKS :SAMVEG IAS

marks of Tina dabi (rank 1)-ias-2015
Essay: 145/250
GS Paper 1 :119/250
GS Paper 2 :84/250
GS Paper 3 :111/250
GS Paper 4 :110/250
GS Total: 424/ 1000
Political Sci & IR Paper 1 : 128/250
Political Science & IR Paper 2 : 171/250
Optional total :299/ 500
Written total : 868/ 1750
Interview :195/275
Total : 1063 /2025

1st attempt,2015 passout, English medium, David Sir Board, AIR 43
ROLL NO. : 0627208
NAME : KUMAR HARSH
ESSAY (PAPER-I)
145
GENRAL STUDIES -I (PAPER-II)
105
GENRAL STUDIES -II (PAPER-III)
091
GENRAL STUDIES -III (PAPER-IV)
107
GENRAL STUDIES -IV (PAPER-V)
110
OPTIONAL-I (PHILOSOPHY) (PAPER-VI)
115
OPTIONAL-II (PHILOSOPHY) (PAPER-VII)
095
WRITTEN TOTAL
768
PERSONALITY TEST
182
FINAL TOTAL
950

Rank - 70s
Essay 139
GS Paper 1 - 113
GS Paper 2 - 93
GS Paper 3 - 115
GS Paper 4 - 110
GS Total - 431
Pub Ad. 1- 100
Pub ad- 2 - 95
Optional total - 195
total - 765
interview - saxena -171
Rank - 70s
.All I can say for now is that quantity does matter (along with quality)...i.e. Write more and more if you know more..
2.Point format definitely helps esp. in GS
3.Examples boost your marks - highly relevant in GS 4
4. GS 1 and 3 - you can be a little confident about your score if you have prepared these ( I expected even more in GS 1)
5. Ethics paper -
earlier I used to attempt case studies first and also spent more time on part B and then come to partA and I used to score miserably (87 and 86) This year I attempted part A first.
And this was a suggestion given by my senior that we can spend a little extra time on first 3-4 Qs ( to make some good impressions on examiner) - I followed it and it helped.
In case studies also more analysis of the option which you are going to select would be better. In addition, it's better to provide more pragmatic answers which are realitic.

Rank 57
ESSAY (PAPER-I)
118
GENRAL STUDIES -I (PAPER-II)
113
GENRAL STUDIES -II (PAPER-III)
085
GENRAL STUDIES -III (PAPER-IV)
105
GENRAL STUDIES -IV (PAPER-V)
113
OPTIONAL-I (ANTHROPOLOGY) (PAPER-VI)
122
OPTIONAL-II (ANTHROPOLOGY) (PAPER-VII)
133
WRITTEN TOTAL
789
PERSONALITY TEST (D K Dewan board)
154
FINAL TOTAL
943

Ranks 80s
ESSAY (PAPER-I)
117
GENRAL STUDIES -I (PAPER-II)
108
GENRAL STUDIES -II (PAPER-III)
081
GENRAL STUDIES -III (PAPER-IV)
108
GENRAL STUDIES -IV (PAPER-V)
102
GS TOTAL - 399
OPTIONAL-I (PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION) (PAPER-VI)
110
OPTIONAL-II (PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION) (PAPER-VII)
127
OPTIONAL TOTAL PUB AD - 237
PERSONALITY TEST
179
FINAL TOTAL
932

Rank 9 -IAS-2015
ESSAY (PAPER-I)
138
GENRAL STUDIES -I (PAPER-II)
110
GENRAL STUDIES -II (PAPER-III)
095
GENRAL STUDIES -III (PAPER-IV)
114
GENRAL STUDIES -IV (PAPER-V)
095
OPTIONAL-I (POL. SC. & INT.REL.) (PAPER-VI)
125
OPTIONAL-II (POL. SC. & INT.REL.) (PAPER-VII)
099
WRITTEN TOTAL
776
PERSONALITY TEST
206
FINAL TOTAL
982

Cabinet clears national IPR policy, gives innovation a push

Cabinet clears national IPR policy, gives innovation a push
Intellectual Property Rights policy aims to encourage creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship in the country
The government on Friday unveiled a National Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) policy to promote the IP regime and to encourage creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship in India.
The policy seeks to put in place a legal framework that will encourage the IPR regime and reduce the time taken by the government to approve a trademark to a month by 2017. Currently, the process takes more than a year.
“Our intellectual property laws are WTO (World Trade Organization)-compliant. So there is no immediate plan to amend any Act,” finance minister Arun Jaitley said at a media briefing, adding that the policy will focus on commercialization of IPRs as well as their enforcement.
The policy, approved by the cabinet on Thursday, makes the department of industrial policy and promotion (DIPP) the nodal agency for regulating IP rights in the country.
Objectives of the policy include strengthening the legal and legislative framework of IPRs, their commercialization; and reinforcing the enforcement and adjudicatory mechanisms for IPR infringements.
India’s first IPR policy comes at a time when developed economies are trying to put in place even stronger IPR frameworks through mega-regional trade agreements.
India’s IPR regime is already in sync with WTO’s agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), said Jaitley. “...as and when global trends move forward, a continuous evolution of these laws will always be required,” he added.
India’s strained patent and IP administration has failed to keep pace with growing technological advances. Global pharmaceuticals firms have often complained about India’s price controls and marketing restrictions.
Nirmala Sitharaman, commerce and industry minister, told lawmakers last month that over 237,000 applications were pending in the country’s four patent offices.
The new policy will try to safeguard the interests of rights owners keeping in mind the wider public interest while combating infringements of IPRs.
Jaitley said India would retain the right to issue so-called compulsory licences to its drug firms, under “emergency” conditions, and would not immediately need to change patent laws that were already fully WTO-compliant.
“Compulsory licences are already provided in our patent law. That existing provision will continue,” Jaitley said.
Compulsory licences allow a domestic drug manufacturer to produce patented drugs that are not available to the public at a reasonable price.
Last month, the US Trade Representative kept India, China and Russia on its “Priority Watch List” for inadequate improvement in IPR protection.
In 2015, India ranked 29 out of 30 countries in the International IP Index released by the Global Intellectual Property Center of the US Chamber of Commerce. This ranking measures the overall IP environment in a country, and China was ranked 19 in the same list.
The policy document says: “India shall remain committed to the Doha Declaration on TRIPS Agreement and Public Health.”
The Doha Declaration is a 2001 WTO text which recognized that IP and patent regimes have to be looked at in the context of burning health issues such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and other diseases.
Policy analyst Shalini Bhutani said the policy failed to address a few points of pressure on the IPR front.
“The policy doesn’t secure us against the seed industry and the new generation free trade agreements/bilateral investment treaties which demand higher WTO-plus standards,” she said.
Experts welcomed the move to make DIPP the nodal agency on IPRs.
“The most important change that this policy seeks to bring all the patent offices under one roof, that is DIPP, to promote efficient and effective working between various offices,” said Yashawant Dev Panwar of the Patent Facilitating Centre at the Technology Information, Forecasting and Assessment Council. “The next major thing is that on an international forum, we want to create system to protect traditional knowledge. This has been referred on several occasions in the policy.”

Featured post

UKPCS2012 FINAL RESULT SAMVEG IAS DEHRADUN

    Heartfelt congratulations to all my dear student .this was outstanding performance .this was possible due to ...