18 December 2015

the launch of the 2015 Human Development Report

the launch of the 2015 Human Development Report
UNDP expresses its profound gratitude to Ethiopia for hosting this launch, and for His Excellency the Prime Minister’s presence here with us today to give the keynote speech and launch the report.
There can be no doubt that history will judge 2015 to be a remarkably important year for setting global development-related agendas.
In July, here in Addis Ababa, a new global agenda for financing development was agreed.
Earlier, in Sendai, Japan, the new framework for disaster risk reduction was agreed.
In September the Sustainable Development Goals were adopted in New York.
In the past two weeks COP21 in Paris has progressed the global effort to tackle climate change, culminating in a landmark new climate agreement on Saturday.
There have also been major global and regional meetings on migration.
I mention all these major agendas because work, the subject of this year’s Human Development Report, relates to them all.
Full and productive employment and decent work for all is a central plank of the SDGs, including Goal 8’s explicit emphasis on work: “Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment, and decent work for all”.
Tackling climate change,as countries re-committed to do at COP21 in Paris last Saturday, will require structural changes to every economy. New work will be created. Existing jobs will disappear, or will need to be transformed. Climate action goals will not be achieved without this shift.
Migrationpresents political challenges to many countries, yet also stands to benefit source and recipient countries if it is orderly. That requires both more legal channels to be established, and international agreements to be upheld.
The 2015 Human Development Report comes at a time of major changes in the world of work, affecting when, how, and where people work. This too creates both opportunities and challenges. We see:
dramatic demographic Populations of older people are growing rapidly worldwide. By 2050, people older than sixty will, for the first time in history, equal those younger than fifteen. Societies worldwide are rethinking the role which older people play in the workforce, and exploring whether the retirement age should be raised.
globalisation and the digital revolutionare continuing to gather speed. There are now around as many mobile phone subscriptions - seven billion – worldwide as there are people. This has dramatic impacts on the world of work, as it does on all aspects of economies and societies.
To understand the impacts of development fully, one needs to look at how it is affecting people’s lives. That has been at the heart of every human development report in the past 25 years. Changes in the world of work have major implications for human development – which is why this new report is so timely.
Allow me now to turn to the key messages of the report.
Work is More than Jobs
This report puts people rather than economies or economic growth at its centre, by focusing on all kinds of paid and unpaid work from running a home to running a business.
Work helps people escape from poverty. It can also help forge stronger communities, develop skills, and give people a sense of purpose. Work is much more than a pay check: it is a foundation for both the richness of economies and the richness of human lives.
There is no automatic link between work and human development.
Even though people are healthier and better educated, and a much smaller proportion are living in extreme poverty than ever before, major inequities and challenges continue to prevent some groups of people from entering the work force.
This matters – access to work is vital for human development. But the link is not automatic. It is the quality of work – not just the amount – which determines whether work will enhance human development. Today more than 1.5 billion people in developing countries are working in jobs which offer few rights and inadequate protection should they lose their livelihoods.
This report pays particular attention to the most vulnerable in society, including those who are most unfairly treated in the labour market. They include child labourers, trafficked workers, forced workers, workers in hazardous conditions, and women.
The report makes the case that women are especially disadvantaged in the world of work:
Three out of every four hours ofunpaid work are done by women. Compare that to men, who do two of every three hours of paid Pressures on women will increase as countries age, because it is women who still do most of the care work.
Not only are women doing much more unpaid work than men, but when they get paid, they get paid less. Women earn an average of 24 per cent less than their male colleagues worldwide.
Women hold only around a fifth of senior leadership positions worldwide. Indeed, almost one-third of businesses have no women at all in senior management positions.
The report argues that societies urgently need new policies, institutional reforms, and more equitable access to care services to address these major gender imbalances in paid and unpaid work. It calls on governments to ensure:
equal pay for equal work for women and men;
adequate provision of paid parental leave for both women and men; and
tackle the harassment and social norms which exclude many women from paid work.
Sharing the burden of unpaid care work and enabling more women to enter the labour force on equal terms has wide benefits. It stands to reason that whole societies are worse off if half of their members can’t participate fully.
Achieving sustainable development Will Mean Changes for the Workforce
Many jobs will need to change if countries are to make progress on building low emission and climate-resilient futures. These changes will help determine what the labour market of tomorrow looks like.
Certain jobs – renewable energy production, for example - will grow in number. Other work will need to change, such as some methods of agricultural production. Other jobs will disappear altogether over time. Countries will have to confront political, social, and economic challenges as these changes take place.
Globalisation has winners and losers
The digital revolution and deepening globalization have brought greater workforce flexibility and new working patterns, but they have also heightened insecurity and vulnerability.
There are more opportunities for highly skilled workers and those with access to technology and the internet. Digital technologies connect producers to consumers in global marketplaces, improving access to goods, services, finance, technology, and ideas. Those with skills in demand in the digital economy can command salaries set in global labour markets.
But these same changes bring risks for others, including those without access to the internet. The report predicts that many routine jobs, such as clerical work, will continue to disappear. Globalisation also means other jobs will move abroad.
Calls for Action
The report concludes with a call for global and national action to guarantee workers’ rights and promote sustainable work in the fast changing world of work. Three particularly important proposals highlighted by the report are:
establishing a new social contract between state, society, and private sector to improve social protection;
deepening co-operation between workers, businesses, and governments around the world to craft a Global Deal to guarantee workers’ rights. The International Labour Organisation’s recent convention for paid domestic workers points in this direction; and
promoting fair income, security in the workplace, and social protection for workers and their families through the Decent Work Agenda of the ILO.
Conclusion
This new global Human Development Report is an urgent call to tackle one of the world’s great development challenges - providing enough decent work and livelihoods for all.
Work provides the means to tackle poverty, empower minorities by being inclusive, and protect our environment if jobs are green in a green economy. The world of work is changing more rapidly than ever before. The question is: what are the best policy responses to ensure that human development benefits from that change.
I hope that this report will generate dialogue and debate on the challenges identified, as all previous Human Development Reports have done.
In that way, the Report will help countries to adjust to the changing world of work in ways which will advance human development.

Reimagining our big cities

Reimagining our big cities
One of the reasons big cities are earning a bad name is their inability to mobilise money for infrastructure development...
Many of us would have seen a sticker — usually stuck on the back of a small car — that cheekily proclaims: “When I grow up, I want to be a Mercedes.” If Chennai were a car, maybe it would have said, “When I grow up, I want to be like London or New York.”
Cities across the world have been pushing themselves hard to be the next London or New York. The reasons are not hard to seek: over several decades now economists have been celebrating cities not just as a magic pill to get the world rid of poverty but as a turbo-charged engine that can transport people to a land of eternal prosperity. In fact, a UN Habitat report calls cities “the highest pinnacles of human creation”. The same report also says that by 2050, two-thirds of the global population will be living in urban areas; the World Bank estimates that the developing world will account for over 90 per cent of urban growth. Now the question is: do the developing countries really understand the rules of the game they are so keen on playing?
Vasanth Srinivasan As the recent deluge in Chennai indicates, the “urban growth at any cost” strategy seems to be coming home to roost. Not that nobody saw it coming: a 2014 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group report says emerging global climate risks are concentrated in urban sprawls.
So is urbanisation with big urban agglomerations a flawed model? In other words, does the future belong to smaller but easily manageable cities? Expert opinion seems mixed.
Durganand Balsavar, principal architect, Artes — Human Settlement Development Collaborative, says a network of smaller urban centres is a better alternative. “A large urban agglomeration cannot be made the norm. The location of the city, environmental conditions, resources have to be considered.” Some experts say the opposite is true: big cities, given their density and spread, are capable of bringing in transformative changes with long-term sustainable benefits. Says Raj Cherubal, director, Chennai City Connect, an organisation that collaborates with the government on urban planning and governance: “What we should address is mindless growth. Small or big does not matter.”
Defining cities
If we are talking planned growth, then, as Mr. Cherubal asks, “What and where is the city? In Chennai, for example, the lakes are the responsibility of the Public Works Department, the suburban train is with the Central government, the Mass Rapid Transport System is Centre plus State, the Metro is State, some roads are with the National Highways Authority of India. This is not what you would see in cities such as Paris or London where all the functions are with the city.”
Assuming big cities are beasts that can be tamed, what route does one take? Transit-oriented development (TOD) — a high-density commercial-cum-residential area situated within a radius of 1 km from a transit station (could be a metro, train or bus stop) — is what he prescribes.
While Hong Kong, which is comparable with Chennai in terms of area and population, is a good example of a successful TOD model, the Houston or Atlanta model — with people spreading out farther and farther away from the core city — is being cited as a bad growth template. “The inner core cities should have a big tax base for supporting its own infrastructure too,” explains Mr. Cherubal.
Raising resources
One of the reasons big cities are earning a bad name is their inability to mobilise money for infrastructure development and upkeep, a universal problem that is more acute in India given our dismal track record in decentralisation.
The noble intention behind the Nagarpalika Act (that aims to empower urban local bodies) brought through the 74th Constitutional Amendment often does not get translated into action, as local bodies wait for the State or Centre’s nod for many things, particularly fund mobilisation.
This is also where the concept of “land value capture” that works in consonance with TOD assumes importance. A public financing model, it is designed to recover some or all of the money spent on public infrastructure by extracting the value that such an infrastructure has created for private landowners (in terms of appreciation in the value of the property). It usually takes the form of an ad valorem property tax.
The two capitals model
The problems faced by big cities have also rekindled the “two capitals” debate. However, M.G. Devasahayam, a former IAS officer and an expert in urban development and governance, says the idea is outdated. “If you find Chennai crowded today, it is not because it is the seat of government. Commercial activities need not be concentrated in Chennai. Places such as Coimbatore and Tiruchi have a good industrial base. We should develop these places.”
As Mr. Balsavar says, devolution needs to go hand in hand with capacity-building and awareness at the ward level. Adds Mr. Devasahayam: “Go for regional administrators, vest them with power and make four-five collectors report to him. Make a visit to the capital redundant.”
But administrative decentralisation without empowering people is a road to nowhere. As policymakers reimagine the concept of the “big city”, they need to address the sense of alienation that rapid urbanisation brings with it. As Ceasar McDowell, professor of the Practice of Community Development at Massachusetts Institute of Technology points out, “What we understand about democracy is that most people have opted out. So, you have to ask people in the form they’re used to having conversations in, and you have to show up where they are.”
This is where implementing the 74th Amendment in letter and spirit could make a “big” difference.

The World Bank has approved a $1.5 billion loan for the ambitious clean India campaign

The World Bank has approved a $1.5 billion loan for the ambitious clean India campaign to support the government in its efforts to ensure all citizens in rural areas have access to improved sanitation and end the practice of open defecation by 2019.
As per World Bank statistics, of the 2.4 billion people who lack access to improved sanitation globally, more than 750 million live in India, with 80 per cent living in rural areas.
More than 500 million of the rural population in India continue to defecate in the open, suffering from preventable deaths, illness, stunting, harassment and economic losses.
The loan will be used for Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM) Support Operation Project.
“One in every ten deaths in India is linked to poor sanitation. And studies show that low-income households bear the maximum brunt of poor sanitation,” said Onno Ruhl, World Bank Country Director for India.
“This project, aimed at strengthening the implementation of the Swachh Bharat initiative of the government, will result in significant health benefits for the poor and vulnerable, especially those living in rural areas,” he said.
“Incentivising good performance by states and the focus on behavioural changes are two important components of this project,” he said.
The Bank said the Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation (MDWS) will play the overseeing and coordinating role for the programme and support the participating states.
Funds will also be used to develop the capacity of MDWS in program management, advocacy, monitoring and evaluation.
“India has demonstrated extraordinary leadership in pursuing the ambitious SBM campaign and embracing the focus on behaviour to complement the construction of toilets,” said Annette Dixon, World Bank Vice President for the South Asia Region.
The World Bank will also provide a parallel $25 million technical assistance to build the capacity of select state governments in implementing community-led behavioural change programmes targeting social norms to help ensure widespread usage of toilets by rural households

India’s climate leadership at Paris

India’s climate leadership at Paris
India has done well to defend its development priorities, while detailing its ambitious renewable energy targets
The agreement on climate change, reached in Paris on 12 December, was momentous for reasons beyond the obvious. The world watched the two weeks of negotiations at COP21 (Conference of Parties) eagerly, hoping for a strong and definitive agreement to mitigate and adapt to climate change and develop a road map for securing the means by which these targets could be achieved. However, there were several tense moments, with India often in the thick of things, which suggested that the hope for such an agreement might have been too optimistic or misguided.
For there to be a climate deal, one that Prime Minister Narendra Modi calls a victory for climate justice—a concept heralded by India as central to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change’s principles—is indicative of India’s front-line role in influencing the text, tone and spirit of the Paris agreement.
To understand whether India has gained or lost from this deal, the reference to a context is critically important. The most recent and relevant context is the Bonn context. The Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (ADP) meeting in Bonn, came up with the initial text five weeks before COP21, with much of it in square brackets, clearly showing the lack of agreement on almost every major topic.
One major point of discord was an attempt by the US to discard the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR). US secretary of state John Kerry’s statement that India will be a challenge at the Paris summit was clearly an attempt at putting pressure on the country. While the negotiations were underway in Paris, The New York Times published a cartoon with an elephant labelled India obstructing the Paris climate summit train, mocking India’s stand at the negotiations.
Undeterred by the pressure, CBDR, a tenet central to the UNFCCC charter, was defended valiantly by India with support from other like-minded developing countries. While the agreement has responsibilities for all nations, India was able to get the agreement to retain the principle of CBDR in the key elements of technology transfer, finance, adaptation and capacity building.
The second context is the Kyoto context. Kyoto Protocol, the contentious 1997 agreement, pinned the responsibilities of deep mitigation as well as financial support on developed countries alone, with developing countries, like India, taking all climate mitigation actions contingent on receiving financial and technological support. The Paris agreement, if viewed from this perspective, is a loss for India. In all probability, given past failures of developed countries to meet their obligations, finance and technology will not be forthcoming for all domestic mitigation actions.
However, India realizes that the global economy, energy markets and climate science have come a long way since 1997. Further, India, along with most countries of the world, wanted the Paris agreement to have a scope much broader than the Kyoto Protocol. As a result, India played a constructive role in arguing for ambitious commitments on finance (a floor under of $100 billion), capacity building (including for monitoring and reporting) and technology support (including partnerships) from developed to developing countries, without being obstructionist as it was often wrongly accused of being.
The deal in effect has given India something in between the Kyoto perspective and the Bonn perspective. India has done well to defend its development priorities, while detailing its ambitious renewable energy targets. The path-changing outcome of the deal is that it is going to change the state of global markets, decidedly away from long-term investment in fossil fuels. The rate of decline in energy technology costs will fundamentally determine how the world actually ramps up mitigation effort.
India has positioned itself as a leader in the renewable energy space by spearheading the creation of the International Solar Alliance (ISA). ISA, through the principle of demand aggregation, could potentially lead to significant further decline in solar technology costs, as multiple countries come together for scaling global solar power production. This is what India did domestically with the hugely successful LED procurement and distribution programme. It is only through market interventions like these that the costs of mitigation technologies could be lowered globally, making mitigation actions relatively easier, as well as lowering the need for supporting finance from the developed world.
Further, the progressive monitoring of actions by the developed world as well as the scaling up of commitments (which are optional for developing countries) provide a lever for India and other developing countries to hold the developed world accountable, compelling them to do more than they have done so far. The developed countries have no more excuses left for their lack of ambition or action. Monitoring of actions by countries, a clause that does not include differentiation, is beneficial at its best and redundant at its worst, as countries already submit national communications of their emissions. It remains to be seen if the national action monitoring will result in increased actions on the ground—this will be the determining factor of the impact of the Paris agreement.
Give and take in international negotiations is imperative, and what India has managed to achieve at Paris, in text and in actions beyond the text, is commendable. What India really needs to ensure is that it alters the mitigation debate from challenges to opportunities. India would do well to grab the opportunities for developing domestic solar panel manufacturing industries, energy storage solutions, grid integration solutions, electric vehicles, battery manufacturing facilities and building a skilled renewable energy workforce. All of these initiatives would be both essential and spurred by India’s domestic priorities of Make in India, the 175GW renewable energy target and the 24x7 electricity for all target.

ISRO to launch six Singapore satellites today

ISRO to launch six Singapore satellites today
The satellite can capture images of Singapore once every 100 minutes and tracks threats in the sea and air as well as natural disaster across the region.
Indian Space Research Organisation’s (ISRO) PSLV rocket on Wednesday will launch six Singaporean satellites that would help the city-state gather information on disaster monitoring and urban planning.
To be launched from Satish Dhawan Space Centre in the spaceport of Andhra Pradesh’s Sriharikota at 6.00 p.m. on Wednesday, the satellites will be put into orbit by Indian Space Research Organisation’s (ISRO) Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV) — PSLV-C29 on reaching 550 kms from the earth’s surface.
The satellites would be launched one after another, 30 seconds apart, to avoid collision and set a distance of about 20 kilometres between them. The 59-hour-countdown for the PSLV-C29/TeLEOS-1 Mission began at 7.00 a.m. on Monday and was progressing normally, ISRO said.
For the first time, the satellites will orbit around the equator and gather data that will benefit those in the equatorial region. The satellites will be put into a 550 kms circular orbit inclined at 15 degrees to the equator.
“The satellites will be able to produce information at a much higher frequency. This will surely be very important when you use it for disaster monitoring in the region like Southeast Asia,” Project Director of the Satellite Programme at the National University of Singapore (NUS) Professor Goh Cher Hiang said.
“For urban planning, before you plan a township, you would want to take a look at the terrain, take a look at the area around it, see what you have there, what kind of obstacles you may face, where are the draining systems, main highway,” President of the Communication and Sensor Systems Group at ST Electronics Tang Kum Chuen said.
“If we have our own Singapore-made satellites, we can customise the technology, the sensors and instruments to meet our own needs. For instance, we can monitor haze. We can get the information anywhere, any time,” Channel News Asia quoted Director of the Satellite Research Centre at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) Associate Professor Low Kay Soon as saying.
The satellite can capture images of Singapore once every 100 minutes and tracks threats in the sea and air as well as natural disaster across the region. The satellites are made by NUS, NTU and engineering commercial company ST Electronics.
ISRO is using its trusted workhorse PSLV which is on its 32nd flight in ‘core-alone’ configuration without the use of solid strap-on motors.
Of the six satellites, TeLEOS-1 is the primary satellite weighing 400 kgs whereas the other five satellites include two micro-satellites and three nano-satellites. TeLEOS-1 is the first Singapore commercial earth observation satellite. It would be launched into a low Earth orbit for “remote sensing” applications. Antrix Corporation Ltd, the commercial arm of ISRO, has provided launch services in PSLV for 51 customer satellites from 20 countries so far.

Analysis of Essay paper(2015 IAS mains)


       Analysis of Essay paper(2015 IAS mains)

 

This time UPSC orientation is more Philosophical than last year.Except two direct essay ,they tried to provide level playing field to all aspirants.Effort of UPSC to provide level playing field to all and reducing the narrow view of preparation continued.Although good preparation and writing practice help to write better organised essay.So those who prepared well will be at advantage,but focus is on your creativity,broad thinking,ability to link the knowledge of various field in just those three hours.

                                          Section A

Q1: Lending hand to someone is better than dole.
Motivation Behind the topic: we can see people are contributing fund for swachh bharat,Namami Gange,but not participating and not following in actual scenario.People has to participate,associate till result come to see the change.
Q2: Quick but steady wins the race.
Motivation Behind the topic: this is modified and modern day reality. earlier it was slow and steady wins the race.but now days it is impossible for slow to win the race. Govt organisation has to change their attitude to wards fastening the process.Technology has changed everything.But consistency is still required in system.
Q3 :Character of institution reflected in its leader
Motivation Behind the topic: New govt and its Leadership.Political parties and their Leadership. Business and their Leader.Leader inspire,leader change the institution.scrapping of PC and establishing NITI AYOG shows influence of Leadership.
Q4: Education without values
Motivation Behind the topic: since NDA came into power ,this issue was in air,frequent article criticising govt attitude.But it was not expected.already upsc has asked same essay.Last year also they ask education related question

                                             Section B

Q1 Technology can not replace ManPower
Motivation Behind the topic:Too much emphasize by government on Make in india,manufacturing,Digital India, E governance pressurised upsc to ask such question.if Good written by candidate as there was no dearth of material will fetch good marks.
Q2:Crisis faced in India:moral or economic.
Motivation Behind the topic:PM deliver lecture   on Moral values so offten.sometime it seems that everything can be made good if every one  perform their respective duty wrt nation,society ,family and themselves morally.
Q3: Dreams which should not let india sleep.
Motivation Behind the topic:WOW!!! UPSC is impressed with Kalam sahab.A direct tribute to Kalamji.This was expected one.This essay  will fetch very good marks if  someone wrote it directly from his heart. UPSC itself is dream that didnot let candidate sleep.
Q4: Can capitalism bring inclusive growth
Motivation Behind the topic:most expected topic. everyone has prepared it well because of too much emphasize by governemnt,but twist is capitalism.hope candidate have taken care.

Roadmap to Generate Power from Nuclear Energy

Roadmap to Generate Power from Nuclear Energy
With a view to optimally utilise limited uranium reserves and large thorium reserves in the country, the Department of Atomic Energy has adopted a three stage nuclear power programme, based on a closed nuclear fuel cycle, for generation of nuclear power and for achieving long term energy security. The three stage nuclear power programme, which is to be implemented sequentially, aims to multiply the domestically available fissile resources through the use of natural Uranium in Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors (first stage), followed by use of Plutonium obtained from the spent fuel of Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors in Fast Breeder Reactors, in the second stage. Large scale use of Thorium will subsequently follow making use of Uranium-233 that will be bred in Fast Breeder Reactors, when adequate nuclear installed capacity in the country has been built. Accordingly, the utilisation of Thorium as a practically inexhaustible energy source has been contemplated during the third stage of the Indian nuclear programme, which can be reached after a few decades. The first stage of nuclear power programme comprising indigenous Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors (PHWRs) is in industrial domain. A Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR) under the second stage is being commissioned by Bharatiya Nabhikiya Vidyut Nigam Limited (BHAVINI) at Kalpakkam, Tamil Nadu.

For the near term, the Government in July 2014, had announced tripling of the then existing capacity of 4780 MW in the next ten years, that is by the year 2024. A capacity of 1000 MW has already been added with the start of commercial operation of Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project Unit-1 (KKNPP 1) in December, 2014. The nuclear power capacity is expected to reach 10080 MW on progressive completion of projects presently under commissioning/construction by the year 2018. The Government has accorded financial sanction for two more projects namely Gorakhpur Haryana Anu Vidyut Pariyojana (GHAVP) Units 1&2 (2x700 MW) and Kudankulam Nuclear Power Projects (KKNPP) Units – 3&4 (2X1000 MW) with a total capacity of 3400 MW. These are being readied for start of construction in 2016. Another 2 x700 MW project is also planned to be taken up in the near future. On progressive completion of these projects, the target is expected to be achieved by the year 2024.

The Department of Atomic Energy is in touch with all the concerned Ministries/Agencies of the Government as well as State Governments with regard to establishing nuclear power plants in the country. All suggestions received from them, which are helpful in advancing the nuclear power programme are accepted for implementation. 

Featured post

UKPCS2012 FINAL RESULT SAMVEG IAS DEHRADUN

    Heartfelt congratulations to all my dear student .this was outstanding performance .this was possible due to ...