Eleven years after it was first mooted in Parliament, the Rajya Sabha has finally adopted a goods and services tax. After
the mere formality of its passage in the Lok Sabha for an approval of
the amendments made, it will have to be considered and approved by a
majority of State Assemblies before it can be sent to the President for
assent. For now, Parliament’s stamp is historic as the proposed tax will
alter the powers of taxation that States enjoyed under the Constitution
and usher in a uniform consumption-based tax structure across the land
for almost all goods and services. Only potable alcohol is proposed to
be excluded from the GST’s ambit, according to Finance Minister Arun
Jaitley, with petroleum products set to be pegged at a zero per cent
rate till such time as the proposed GST Council reaches an agreement
with the States and the Centre on an acceptable framework for taxation.
That the two main players — the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Congress —
were able to narrow their differences restores a degree of faith in the
capacity of the political class to put the nation above petty
self-serving interests. While it is a pity that consensus took so long
to forge, both parties deserve a measure of credit for seeing the
legislation through. The BJP for being accommodative in the face of
reservations about specific provisions, which was accompanied by a
much-needed change in tack in dealing with the Opposition. And the
Congress, which became increasingly isolated on the issue and risked
appearing cussedly obstructionist, for overcoming its desire to pay the
BJP back in its own coin.
The GST will usher in a nationwide common market and subsume a
multiplicity of Central and State taxes; but this is still some time and
several smaller challenges away. Indeed, the Centre, the States, the
yet-to-be-created GST Council and the vendor tasked with creating the IT
backbone for the administration of the new tax regime have a clear challenge if they are to meet the April 1, 2017 deadline.
Among the tasks ahead is the drafting of the specific Central and State
GST laws that will again need to be passed in Parliament and State
legislatures. Vital decisions, such as the setting of a proposed
revenue-neutral standard rate, remain; these can have far-reaching cost
and price implications for producers and consumers. These would also
have revenue ramifications for governments. And while the Centre may be
tempted to opt to speed up matters by moving the GST legislations as
Money Bills to bypass any debate over specific provisions in the Rajya
Sabha, it would be well-advised to avoid that path to see that the
spirit of hard-won consensus is not frittered away in another round of
political one-upmanship.
No comments:
Post a Comment