Andrew Wiles, British mathematician, has won the 2016 Abel prize for his
“stunning proof of Fermat’s last theorem by way of the modularity
conjecture for semistable elliptic curves, opening a new era of
mathematics,” (to quote from the citation). Awarded by the Norwegian
Academy of Science and Letters, the Abel prize is an international award
given for outstanding scientific work in the field of mathematics,
including mathematical aspects of computer science, mathematical
physics, probability, numerical analysis, scientific computing,
statistics and also mathematical applications in the sciences.
Fermat’s last theorem, which looks deceptively simple, is the statement that the equation xn + yn = zn,
where x, y and z are positive whole numbers, has no solution for n
larger than 2. In what can only be described as tenacious, Professor
Wiles worked on this single problem for nearly a decade before making a
breakthrough, in the process having to develop a lot of mathematics.
Efforts to solve the problem go back 350 years: Pierre de Fermat first
formulated the theorem in the 17th century, and he himself proved the
claim for n = 4; Leonhard Euler proved the case of n = 3 and Sophie
Germain generalised it to infinitely many prime exponents. While Ernest
Kummer’s attempts led to major revelations, the bounty of a full proof
eluded all concerned until Professor Wiles proved it in 1994. R.
Balasubramanian, a well-known number theorist and former director of
Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, declares his happiness at
the award to professor Wiles: “He more than deserves the award, and I
can’t think of anyone else who is better qualified [for the award]. It
is a herculean task and he worked on this problem alone for the last ten
years!... he proved the Shimura-Taniyama-Weil conjecture to the extent
needed and for this he had to develop a lot of mathematics… which has
applications to the Diophantine equations,” he says.
A story of Wiles' pursuit of thesolution, well known among
mathematicians, can be narrated: While at Princeton, Andrew Wiles
started his work on this problem and for seven years worked alone, in
his attic, without telling anyone and after seven years, announced that
he had solved it, in a conference in Cambridge, U.K., only to have a
serious mistake pointed out by a colleague a few months later. He was
not to be outdone and with help from his former student Richard Taylor,
he patched up the gap and proved it successfully a year later. “Many
people believe that if only he had been less than 40 years , he would
have surely won the Fields Medal. This is a fantastic proof,” says Prof.
Balasubramanian. According to an article in Nature, the two papers he published on this work in 1995 took up the entire issue of Annals of Mathematics.
“His work has made it easier to study elliptic curves and modular forms.
It is a step ahead towards the Langlands programme,” says Prof.
Balasubramanian, naming some sought-after areas of mathematics.
Professor Wiles now aims to work on the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer
conjecture — a problem which has a million dollar prize attached. It is
one of the seven millennium problems, only one of which, the Poincare
conjecture, has been solved by Grigori Perelman, so far.
One cannot help but recall John Nash here who won the prize last year,
and also that once the prize has gone to an Indian-origin mathematician
Srinivasa Varadhan.
No comments:
Post a Comment